Discussion about this post

User's avatar
R.W. Richey's avatar

Great post. I hadn't heard of the triple network model. Definitely fascinating, and as you point out it maps pretty well to Kahneman's System 1 and System 2.

Of course as you may know I'm more interested in how these models might end up being ill adapted for a post-internet world where they're constantly in contact with a new gigantic, strange, and artificial brain. McGilchrist's primary argument is that while the right hemisphere should be making the call, the left hemisphere has taken over (though he would date this usurpation to many decades before the internet.) What do other models lead you to believe?

It seems we have one of three possibilities:

1- Modern information technology has improved the brain: Perhaps in some ways, but given that we are adapted to completely different environment, it seems unlikely that we would get a net benefit.

2- Modern infotech does nothing to the brain: Perhaps we're just so resilient that we can take whatever gets throw at us and remain unscathed. Certainly Haidt would disagree with this point, and he does seem to have a pretty good argument.

3- Modern infotech does not play well with the brain and it's messing us up. This is McGilchrist's argument, and Haidt's and many others.

What are your thoughts on which of the three it ends up being, and how the different models you've presented might do a better job of illuminating whether infotech is beneficial or not?

Expand full comment
Kahlil Corazo's avatar

Nice! Let me throw in one more model. I found this extremely helpful, particularly in making sense of some of my default settings https://medium.com/life-tactics/14-tools-for-better-work-and-relationships-from-the-neuroscience-of-emotions-210de40ebebe

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts