Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kahlil Corazo's avatar

Fascinating! There are some aspects you've touched on that I've never considered. I'd love to record a call and publish it to help us both expand our ideas about psychofauna.

Expand full comment
Rajeev Ram's avatar

I'm not really sure I understand how you are using the term 'psychofauna' here differently than 'memeplex', i.e., ideas that live in minds and instantiate themselves in bodies.

I suppose that 'memeplex' is a collection of interconnected memes that work together to enhance their collective survival and replication.

Whereas 'psychofauna', by contrast, are where memes are seen as organisms that interact with 'hosts', environments, and other ideas within a system; which is a more ecological view that is concerned with adaptations, co-location, bundling, etc.

Does that imply that replication/propagation is only one characteristic of psychofauna? Or that psychofauna are describing something that is not just about pure transmission and quantity?

Maybe memeplex : spirit :: psychofauna :: (lower g) god. Every god certainly possesses an animating spirit, but I think you would agree that a god is more substantial than a spirit. That is to say a god/psychofauna is associated with more depth of agency or qualitative presence than the pure motion or quantitative notion of a spirit/memeplex?

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts